Sunday, February 03, 2019

Epiphany 4, Year C (2019)


Jeremiah 1: 4–10; Psalm 71: 1–6; I Corinthians 13: 1–13; Luke 4: 21-30
This is the homily given at St. John’s, Huntingdon, Pennsylvania by Fr. Gene Tucker on Sunday, February 3, 2019.
“LOVE IN THE BIBLE”
(Homily text:  I Corinthians 13: 1-13)
Our Epistle text appointed for this morning is drawn from St. Paul’s first letter to the Corinthians, chapter thirteen. It is, perhaps, one of Paul’s most familiar writings, and one we hear quite frequently, particularly at weddings.
Paul’s subject, set before us this morning, is about love.
Love is a subject that those early Christians in Corinth needed to hear much about. It is a subject that we, today, also need to hear much about.
Since there seems to be some question about love, and about what love is, in the early culture of the city of Corinth and in the age in which we live, perhaps it might be good for us to pause for a moment and remind ourselves – by way of the dictionary definition of love – about the nature of love: Here, then is the Webster’s New Universal Unabridged Dictionary definition (which I offer only in part):
1.   A profoundly tender, passionate affection for another person.
2.   A feeling of warm, personal attachment or deep affection.
3.   Sexual passion or desire, sweetheart. 
4.   A person toward whom love is felt. 
5.   (used in direct address as a form of endearment, affection, or the like, as in, “Would you like to see a movie, love?” 
6.   A love affair, an intensely amorous incident; amour.
7.   A personification of sexual affection, as Eros or Cupid;
8.   Affectionate concern for the well-being of others, the love of one’s neighbor.
9.   The benevolent affection of God for His creatures, or the reverent affection due from them to God. 
10.  Strong predilection, enthusiasm or liking for anything, as in “Her love of books.”
As wonderful as the English language is, it has only one word for love. So in order to distinguish between different kinds of love, we have to add an adjective. For example, we may speak of “Selfless love”.
The Bible too, has much to say about love.  Greek, the language of the New Testament, offers us a richer variety of words to describe love. The New Testament uses two of the three Greek words for love:
Phileo:  This is the love between friends, or perhaps brotherly or sisterly love, as in the city of “Brotherly Love”, Philadelphia.[1]
Agape:  This is self-giving love, the love that loves even if there is no benefit to the one offering the love. It is the sort of love that God has for humankind in the sending of His Son, Jesus Christ.
There is one other Greek word for love, which is not found in the New Testament:
Eros:  This is romantic, sexual love.
With a clearer concept of what love is, let’s turn our attention to the situation which existed in the early Church in Corinth. In truth, the Corinthian church must have qualified as the toughest group that Paul had to lead and manage.
To set the stage, we need to return to chapter one of Paul’s letter.
There, we find that a “party spirit” had infected the Corinthian church. Some claimed to be followers of Peter (Paul uses the Greek name for Peter, Cephas). Others claimed to be followers of Apollos (one of Paul’s coworkers). Others claimed to be followers of Paul. Still others - perhaps in a bid to outdo everyone else - claimed to be followers of Christ.
A little further along in his letter, in chapter eleven,[2] Paul has to set the Corinthians straight about their worship, for their Eucharistic celebrations had devolved into picnics, where well-to-do families would sit down to a sumptuous meal, while poorer members of the church nearby were neglected.
Paul has to remind these Corinthians Christians that everyone is valuable for the work of the Church to go forward. He uses the image of the human body to explain how each person has a part to play in the overall working of the body. For example, he says, “…the body does not consist of one member, but of many. If the foot should say, ‘Because I am not a hand, I do not belong to the body,’ that would not make it any less a part of the body.” (I Corinthians 12: 14 – 15)[3]
Now the stage is set for Paul to define, very clearly, what love is – and what love is not.
“Love is patient, love is kind,” he says. “Love does not envy or boast,” he adds.
(Perhaps Paul is addressing the very behaviors he’d been told were taking place in the Corinthian church.)
The Greek word that Paul uses throughout his treatise on love is agape, that self-giving love seen most clearly in God’s gift of His Son, Jesus Christ.
You and I, it seems to me, are living in much the same sort of world that the early Christians experienced in the first century in the Roman Empire.
Life in that world was harsh and often uncertain. There was a severe shortage of love for one’s neighbor (phileo love), and probably a shortage, as well, of agape love, that love that holds another in love for the sake of the welfare of that other person.
Because life was uncertain, often short, and often filled with hardships, many decided to “eat, drink and be merry”, for who knew what tomorrow would bring? Immorality was rampant, or so the New Testament’s letters tell us.
Does this sound like the world you and I are living in?
I think it does.
Life, for many today, is uncertain, and harsh. Love of any sort that redeems and uplifts is in short supply. I speak of phileo and agape love, of course.
And so, many today choose to “eat, drink and be merry”.
In the process, what happens is that love (love, really and actually) get confused with what a person might want to do, things like “eat, drink and be merry” for the sake of “eating, drinking and being merry” for their own sakes. Many make the same decision as many in the ancient world did because today is what a person’s got and who knows about tomorrow.
Love then becomes synonymous with permissiveness, as in “If you really love me, you’ll let me do whatever I want to do.”
But true love – and now I am speaking of love in the agape sense – wants what is best for that person who is loved. Oftentimes, that means that simply saying “OK” to whatever attitudes and behaviors arise isn’t in that loved person’s best interest.
Agape love isn’t some pie-in-the-sky, altruistic, love that is connected to philosophic musings. Agape love is concrete, and is directed at some specific object, a person. That is the sort of love that God has for you and me, the sort of love that singles each one of us out, so that God can send His love into our hearts.
Because the time, the culture and the age in which we live is the way it is, we would do well to be reminded about the definition of love, true love, and not be deluded into thinking that love is pretty much the same as permissiveness.
It is a sobering lesson we should revisit from time to time.
AMEN.




[1]   Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, shares its name with an ancient city of the same name. it was located in Asia Minor, now western Turkey. The writer of Revelation addresses a letter to the church in Philadelphia. See Revelation 3: 7–13.
[2]   Paul’s description of the events of the Last Supper constitute the earliest written record we have of those events, predating all the Gospel accounts, including Mark’s, by perhaps ten years or more.
[3]   This is a text we heard last week.