Sunday, September 29, 2013

Pentecost 19, Year C

Proper 21 -- Jeremiah 32:1–3a, 6–15; Psalm 91:1–6, 14–16; I Timothy 6:6–19Luke 16:19–31
A homily by Fr. Gene Tucker, given at Trinity Church, Mt. Vernon, Illinois on Sunday, September 29, 2013.


“LOVING SERVICE TO GOD AND OTHERS”

(Homily text:  Luke 16:19–31)

Sometimes, it does us good to consider the meaning of the things we do.


For example, if we think about the rite of baptism, that passage through the waters which makes us sons and daughters of God, then it is good for us to consider this question:


  • Is baptism something that we do, or
  • Is baptism something that God does? 
Far too many times, I am afraid, we think that by being baptized, we are the ones who are choosing to follow the Lord in this way, and that we are the ones who are making ourselves children of God.
By now, of course, having just read that last paragraph, you will discern that the correct answer is that God is the one who is making for Himself children, sons and daughters.  By passing through the waters of baptism, by which we die to ourselves and are raised to a new life (see St. Paul’s explanation of this process as we find it in Romans 6:3–9), following the Lord’s commandment and His example, we are simply responding to God’s initiative, given in Jesus Christ.  The Holy Spirit prompts us to be able to follow the Lord in this way.  Outside of God’s command and the working of the Holy Spirit, we would be totally unable to make ourselves children of God.

Now, if we look again at this business of baptism, another thing we notice is that God is expressing His bottomless love for each one of us, as we pass, one at a time, into the waters and out again into a new life.  In essence, what God is saying is this:  “You are my deeply loved children, a person that I myself have created, and a person that I want to have a deep, long-lasting and loving relationship with.  I want that relationship to begin here and now, as you are baptized.”

Awesome stuff, baptism!

Now, if we are able to hold what we’ve just said about baptism in a place in our minds, let’s turn to Jesus’ parable which is before us today, which is commonly known as “The Parable of the Rich Man and Lazarus”.

Remembering that Jesus is talking to a Jewish audience some 2,000 years ago, there are some commonly held beliefs that most – if not all – of His audience would have had in their minds as they heard Him spin out the tale of the rich man[1] and poor Lazarus.


Among these beliefs would have been the idea that each man in the story, the rich one and the poor one, would have been marked with the sign of the Covenant, that is, circumcision.  By obedience to God’s command, each man would have received the sign of the Covenant on the eighth day of their lives (see Genesis 17: 12).

For another, each man would have claimed to be children of Abraham.  Notice that Jesus’ tale affirms this identity.

For yet another, each man would have known the Scriptures, would have known the Law, and would have known the great Sh’ma,[2] which was ancient Israel’s statement of faith.  It says, “Hear, O Israel:  The Lord our God, the Lord is one.  You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your might.”


Every precept of the Law of Moses would have been a topic of intense and considerate study for every child of the Covenant.

I think we are safe in making these assumptions about Jesus’ audience and their expectations of the two characters in today’s story.

However, Jesus’ parable points out the selective nature of the remembrance of many in Israel at the time that our Lord lived.  Alas, the sad truth that the Scriptures paint of Jewish observance in those long ago days is that it was very selective…some things became extremely important to remember and do, while other things were almost completely forgotten.

Of the utmost importance, it seems, to those ancient peoples, was faithful observance of all the outward rituals associated with worship, and scrupulous observance of the rules governing daily life….Sabbath observance is one example of this emphasis, as was careful avoidance of anything and anyone who was considered to be unclean. This was the main concern, it seems, of the Pharisees, the scribes, and the priestly class.

Forgotten, however, were the requirements of the Law that dealt with doing acts of kindness and charity, of the need to practice hospitality, of the requirement to care for the poor.

Jesus’ parable seems to strike particularly hard at the forgotten parts of the Law.  Perhaps the Lord has in mind this requirement from Deuteronomy 15:7, which reads:  “If among you, one of your brothers should become poor, in any of your towns within the land which the Lord your God is giving you, you shall not harden your heart or shut your hand against your poor brother, but you shall open your hand to him and lend him sufficient for his need, whatever it may be.”

Against this requirement, we can see that Jesus is striking a blow for obedience to God’s command, a command that requires acts of charity, especially to another member of those who claimed to be children of Abraham and heirs of God’s promises.

But in Jesus’ day, the prevailing attitudes toward the poor and the sick had become something else.  (Notice that Jesus paints the picture of Lazarus as being both poor and sick.)  In those days, those who were rich were regarded as having been blessed by God because they had “earned” God’s approval and blessing by their faithful living.  Conversely, those who were poor or who were sick in some way also “deserved” their punishment, due to some sinful condition in their lives.[3]

Someone who was sick was someone who was to be avoided, because they were often ritually unclean, unable to enter the temple’s sacred precincts, due to some physical condition or another, such as having a skin disorder or an open sore.  (Notice that Jesus paints this picture of Lazarus.)

And, of course, that’s exactly the tale that Jesus weaves today, as He describes the rich man’s blindness to Lazarus’ presence and condition.  Jesus is portraying not only the attitude of the “righteous” ones, but also the presence of the many in His day who were poor, sick, or both.

It is good for us to remember that the Lord used common, everyday situations as the raw material for His parables….if, indeed, He was using common occurrences for today’s parable, then it is a sad commentary on the state of society in His day….there must have been many, many poor people whose lot in life was made all the worse by the pious ones in society who would deliberately avoid contact with such miserable human beings…..instead of helping those who needed help, they avoided them, making the lot of the poor and the sick all the worse.

If the Jews of long ago were bound by the terms of their being sons and daughters of the covenant, bound not only to love God, but to love others, and to be a “light to the nations” (as Isaiah puts it), then they were to show the world that God’s love toward them, by virtue of having been chosen by God to be His chosen people, that care for the poor, the sick, and the downtrodden, was to be a hallmark of their manner of living, and of the society that resulted such faithful living to all the requirements of the law.

In a similar way, we who have passed through the waters of baptism and who have become sons and daughters of God under the terms of the New Covenant, have an obligation to care for those who cannot care for themselves.  The New Testament’s record in this matter is quite clear.

St. Luke tells us, in the Book of Acts, that the very early Church cared for each other so much that they pooled their resources together.  As a new person was brought into fellowship with God through Jesus Christ through the Church, they sold their possessions and brought the proceeds to the Apostles.  Their contribution became the property of the Church, for the benefit of all.  (Today, we would call such an arrangement a commune.)

In time, this collective practice ended.  But those early believers still cared for one another, helping one another, supporting one another, loving one another.

It was this hallmark of the Christian faith that helped the early Church grow…For the Church was planted in a society where life was harsh and brutal, a society where there was economic stratification, a place where a large number of poor persons were slaves who had been uprooted from their homelands to serve in an alien city where they were separated from family and friends.

By contrast, the Church offered a place where a relationship with God meant that a person’s life suddenly had meaning, worth and purpose.  The Church was a place where the rich, who were clothed in purple and fine linen, sat next to a slave who was dressed in tatters.  The rich and poor called each other “brothers and sisters”.  To the stratified Roman society of that day and time, this was a scandal.

In our day and time, many of the conditions that pertained to the Roman Empire’s society are present …. Many in our world today don’t see any meaning to their lives, believing that human life is some sort of a cruel joke.  Many are poor, and see little hope of bettering their life’s situation, either for themselves or for their children.  Many are lonely, and feel that no one loves them, no one at all, even God.

Into this situation, God has placed the Church, the body of Christ, made up of those who have passed through the waters of baptism and who have experienced God’s love firsthand.  To Christian believers is given the task to make God’s love known in ways that can be seen, received, and experienced.

Jesus’ timeless tale of the rich man and Lazarus impels us to bring the love of Christ that has been poured into our hearts into the hearts, minds and lives of those around us, especially to the poor, the sick, and the unloved.

We have work to do, to care for the sick, the poor, the unloved and the unlovely!



[1]   Tradition has given the rich man a name:  Dives.  Accordingly, sometimes, this parable is known by the title “The Parable of Dives and Lazarus”.

[2]   The Sh’ma is found in Deuteronomy 6:4–5.


[3]   We can see this attitude clearly in the response of the situation of the man who was born blind (John, chapter nine).  In response to the man’s blindness, they want to know if it was because of his own sin, or the sin of his parents, that he was born blind.

Sunday, September 22, 2013

Pentecost 18, Year C



Proper 20 -- Jeremiah 8:18–9:1; Psalm 79:1-9; I Timothy 2:1-7; Luke 16:1-13

A homily by Fr. Gene Tucker, given at Trinity Church, Mt. Vernon, Illinois on Sunday, September 22, 2013.

“THE 401K PLAN THAT WILL NOT FAIL”
(Homily text:  Luke 16:1-13)

During my Army career many years ago, I learned of a supply sergeant in one of the units in our battalion that was selling boots, camouflage uniforms, canteens and other supplies to local residents of the community where the unit was located.  Apparently word had gotten out that, if a person was looking for good hunting equipment at a cheap price, the back door of the building near to the supply room was the place to be.

Eventually, of course, this supply sergeant’s activities were discovered.  His attempts to change his records to hide the losses in equipment were undone.  As he was relieved of his duties and was mustered out of the service, his plans for a good retirement and a pension disappeared along with his ability to remain in service.  Eventually, he became a security guard at a mall in town.  None of the many who “bought” government property from him were able to make up for the losses he suffered as a result of his dishonest actions.

This unfortunate incident sheds good light on Jesus’ teachings as we hear the Lord’s teaching this morning in His “Parable of the Dishonest Steward”.


On the surface, Jesus’ parable is very difficult to understand.  Even biblical scholars puzzle over it (I am heartened that they do!).


So, as we look at Jesus’ teaching, remembering that He is a master storyteller, let’s examine some of the aspects of His story, in order that we might get a picture of the point of His portrayal of the dishonest steward more clearly.

Right at the beginning of the parable, we see that the steward is suspected of dishonesty.  The steward’s master demands an account of the steward’s actions.  In a panic, the steward calls some of his acquaintances and quickly changes the balance sheet so that the amount they owe is altered in the debtor’s favor. [1]


We might pause here for a moment to see what’s going on.  On the surface of it, what the steward is doing is to create a false amount owed, thereby doing is to create a false amount owed, thereby doing the debtor a favor, for which the dishonest steward expects to be repaid at some point in the future.  Put another way, the steward is essentially saying something on the order of “I did you a favor by reducing your debt, so now – at some point in the future – I am going to demand a favor of you."[2] Or, we might make use of a popular saying which says, “I scratched your back, now I want you to scratch mine.”


The dishonest man is trying to plan for his future, realizing that his options are limited.  Having a circle of friends who owe him something seems to be the best option he can come up with.

But, of course, the assets of the circle of the steward’s friends eventually dries up.  Along with this disappearance, the dishonest man’s retirement plans also evaporate.

That is the point of Jesus’ statement – which seems enigmatic on the surface -  that we read in verse nine.  He says, “Make friends for yourselves by means of unrighteous mammon,[3] so that when it fails they may receive you into the eternal habitations.”

If we read and reread Jesus’ comment, it doesn’t seem to make sense, does it?

Since it is such a difficult statement to grasp, let’s consider what Jesus is saying, and venture an assessment of His meaning.


Allow me to offer my own personal understanding of what the Lord is saying here….
 

I think the Lord is engaging in hyperbole, which is defined as “exaggerated speech”, or an “extravagant statement or figure of speech not intended to be taken literally”.  Hyperbolic speech is intended to prompt reflection, to see beyond the immediate situation or circumstance.  In this sense, Jesus’ statement is intended – I believe – to force His listeners to consider just how they are preparing for their own (eternal) future, and just how they are making use of the assets they currently have for the living of life in this world.

Jesus points out that making earthly friends by dishonest means will eventually fail and will pass away.  Along with that failure comes the reality that the “eternal habitations” will be the destination of those who act dishonestly, and those who associate with dishonest actions.  My guess would be that these “eternal habitations” won’t be in God’s presence, but will be elsewhere.

That’s my estimation of what Jesus has in mind, for what it is worth.

But much clearer is Jesus’ comment about the essential meaning of the parable as He makes His closing statement.  Here, He says, “No servant can serve two masters, for either he will hate the one and love the other, or he will be devoted to the one and despise the other.  You cannot serve God and mammon.”

 Essentially, then, the Lord is forcing us to make a choice:  The choice is to:

  • Live honestly in holiness of life, following God’s commands and loving the Lord with all our heart, mind and soul,

            -or-

  • Live the way the world lives, cheating, lying and bribing others to conceal dishonest acts, in order to ensure our own well-being.

 The choice just outlined here brings us to the matter of holiness.

We know what holiness is as we see and learn it from two different sources.


  1. In the instance of knowing God, knowing God’s commands and knowing the holiness of Jesus’ life, we see and encounter the holiness that God demands of His people from God Himself.
  2. By contrast, as we look at the world around us and assess the ways of the world that stand in opposition to the standard of holiness that we see in the Lord, then we can compare the two.

 Comparing the two standards puts us in the middle of a choice. 

It is the same choice that confronted the supply sergeant that I knew about so many years ago, as he had to make a choice to be honest in his care for property that was not his own, and to be honest in his record-keeping so that those records accurately reflected the amount of equipment that was on hand and available, or to be dishonest by falsifying the records and by selling things out of the back door of the building.

It is the same choice that the dishonest steward faces in today’s parable.  He must choose to be honest in caring for his master’s property, or to falsify the records in order to bring the master’s debtors into a web of deceit along with him.

It is the same choice that confronts us today, as we must choose to adhere to God’s demands that we live a holy and blameless life, recognizing that we are merely the stewards of all that God has entrusted into our care.  By so doing, we will go against the prevailing behavioral standards of the world, a world in which people cheat and engage in dishonesty for their own personal gain.

May we, empowered by the Holy Spirit, choose to follow God, loving Him and obeying His commands, as we turn our backs on the ways of the world around us.

AMEN.
            

[1]   The amounts owed are significant.  The amount of oil owed is about 900 gallons of olive oil, while the amount of wheat owed is about 1,000 bushels.  Scholars point out that the Lord is portraying a situation in which the steward is the manager of a sizeable business venture.
[2]   Scholars debate the exact nature of the steward’s actions.  Among the options they discuss the following are most often cited:  1) The steward is simply being dishonest by reducing the amount of the debt;  2) The steward is marking down the amount owed to reflect his own commission, which is his own income, or 3) The steward is reducing the debt to erase interest that was being charged on the debt, in violation of the provisions of Deuteronomy 23:19–20.  Since the amount of reduction varies for the amounts owed for the oil and for the wheat, the first option seems to be the most likely.
[3]   Mammon is a Semitic word meaning “money” or “wealth” or “property”.  It is carried over into the Greek.