Sunday, September 21, 2014

Pentecost 15, Year A

Proper 20 --  Jonah 3: 10 – 4: 11; Psalm 145: 1-8; Philippians 1: 21-27; Matthew 20: 1-16

A homily by Fr. Gene Tucker, given at The Cathedral Church of St. Paul, Springfield, Illinois, on Sunday, September 21, 2014.

“LEGAL CONTRACT, OR GRACIOUS GIFT?”

(Homily text: Matthew 20: 1-16)

            We begin with two questions this morning:

            1.  Is our relationship with God a legal contract,  wherein we receive from God in direct proportion to what we, ourselves, have done?

            -or-

            2.  Are we the beneficiaries of God’s graciousness and gifts, receiving things for which we did not work, and for which we do not deserve to receive on our own merits?

            Essentially, that second question seems to be the point that Jesus is making as He tells the “Parable of the Laborers in the Vineyard”:  We cannot earn God’s goodness toward us.

            Allow me to suggest that a correct understanding of the nature of our relationship with God has been a problem for God’s people at various times in the history of our relating to God.  We’ll explore that in some detail shortly.

            But first, let’s take a look at the parable before us this morning in some detail.

            Jesus lays out a very commonplace scenario as He describes the hiring of a group of workers at daybreak in a marketplace…..the workers are hired, told that they will be paid a denarius for their work that day,[1] and are sent off. 

            Then, the landowner comes, again and again throughout the day, and enlists other workers to join in the work.  It is an interesting and important detail to notice that these later-hires are told that they will be paid “whatever is right.”  No set amount is agreed upon before they head off to the work. 

            The last set of workers is hired at about five o’clock in the afternoon, and they manage to work only one hour.

            Then, Jesus says, the last-hired are paid first.  They are paid one denarius, the same as the first-hired.

            (Wouldn’t our modern sensitivities which have to do with labor laws and with equitable treatment for work performed be offended by such an action?)

            Jesus’ parable must have spoken very powerfully to the Christians who made up the early Church to which Matthew was most likely addressing his gospel account.  After all, it seems possible that Matthew’s church was dealing with Jews in their community who were practicing a legalistic sort of religion, one which was based on a contract with God.

            That contract with God was – in the Jewish estimation of 2,000 years ago – the Law of Moses.  God’s people in those days attempted to keep every requirement of the law, and expected, thereby, to win God’s favor.  There is evidence to suggest that people, in Jesus’ day, believed that if a person was wealthy or was blessed with good health, that that person was blessed by God because they were living a holy life.  Such an approach comes down to the idea that “OK, God, we’ve done so-and-so, so you owe us such-and-such.”

            But Matthew’s church seems to be composed not only of Jews who had come to faith in Jesus, but also Gentiles, who were pagans before coming to Christ.  Perhaps many of these Gentiles felt like they were the later-hires, or the last-hired, in Jesus’ parable.  And, they were sure, that God’s goodness and graciousness was theirs just as much as it had been for the descendents of Abraham.

            We need to return to Jesus’ parable for a moment. 

            Notice that Jesus says that the landowner agreed to pay the later-hired “whatever is right”.  No set amount is agreed upon.  Those who were called to go into the field in the later morning, or in the afternoon or evening, responded in faith to the landowner’s assurance that they would be paid whatever the landowner’s judgment decreed was fair and equitable.

            The latecomers to faith in Jesus who were members of Matthew’s church had also acted in faith, knowing that God would be gracious to them, showering on them out of God’s essential goodness and generosity the gifts that were made available to those who had come to faith earlier on.

            These Gentiles had an important lesson to teach those who were born into the family of Abraham: 

·         We have no inherent claim on God’s goodness. 
·         We have no right to demand that God treat us in any specific way in direct relationship to our actions.
·         Yet God will relate to us in generosity, love and care, if only we will have faith in God’s essential character.

            Our default posture toward God is one of faith.  We cannot claim that we have earned God’s actions toward us.  God, out of His essential nature, will relate to us in generosity of spirit and actions.

            Of that we can be sure, for God will act toward us in accordance with His sovereign will and in the generosity which is His alone to bestow.

AMEN.


[1]  In Jesus’ day, one denarius was the wage for a common day laborer for one day’s work.  Such a wage would have barely supported a family at a subsistence level.  The New Revised Standard Version (NRSV) translation of the Bible that we are using omits this fact, instead saying that the laborers were hired “for the usual daily wage”.