Sunday, August 17, 2014

Pentecost 10, Year A



Proper 15 -- Isaiah 56: 1-7; Psalm 67; Romans 11: 13–15, 29-32; Matthew 15: 21-28
A homily by Fr. Gene Tucker, given at The Cathedral Church of St. Paul, Springfield, Illinois, on Sunday, August 17, 2014.

“IS THIS A TEST?”
(Homily text:  Matthew 15: 21-28)

            Is this a test? 

            Is Jesus’ give-and-take with the Canaanite woman in our gospel reading for this morning a test of her faith?  Did Jesus respond so harshly to her in order to see if she would persist in her request that her daughter be healed, or if she would turn away?

            Perhaps this is one way to regard Jesus’ encounter with the woman.  We don’t know exactly from the text itself why He responded to her as He did.  However, it does seem that Jesus’ response could easily have caused her to turn around and leave.  But she didn’t, she offered a creative response to Jesus’ statement about “throwing the children’s food to the dogs.”

            However, it’s possible that I am getting ahead of myself.

            Let’s take a few moments to examine some details about the text and the setting for this incident, before coming to some conclusions about its importance.

            As we look at the text, the first thing that prompts our attention is the region of Tyre and Sidon.  These are two cities which are located on the coast of the Mediterranean Sea, in the area known as Lebanon.  They are northwest of the area around Galilee, where Jesus had been working prior to this incident.  Some scholars posit the idea that Jesus headed in the direction of these two cities in order to get away from the pressure of the crowds who were beginning to follow Him.  Matthew does not tell us why Jesus decided to leave the area around Galilee, although we do know from the preceding chapters in Matthew that Jesus had begun to attract more and more interest among the people in the area.

            Next, we notice that Matthew tells us that the woman is a Canaanite.  The significance in telling us about her racial background is that she is a Gentile, not a Jew.  If we are to take Matthew’s characterization literally, her identity would lead us to believe that she was a descendent of the peoples who inhabited the Holy Land before the Israelites came into the land after leaving Egypt, some 1,400 years earlier.

            A detail in the interchange between Jesus and the woman does not normally emerge in translation (unfortunately).  It has to do with the word which is usually translated as “dog”.  The better translation would be “puppy dog”, for the diminutive form of the word is used in the Greek.  So Jesus’ statement would be better translated as “It is not fair to take the children’s food and throw it to the puppies.”  The use of this word seems to indicate that Jesus is referring to puppy dogs who might be members of a family’s household, not to the semi-wild, stray dogs which were regarded as unclean animals in Jewish culture.  If this analysis is correct, Jesus seems to affirm the idea that a relationship exists between the human and animal members of a household.  The Canaanite woman seizes on this distinction in making her quick-witted response, as she says, “Yes, Lord, but even the puppies eat the crumbs that fall from their master’s table.”[1]

            As we look at the shape of this encounter, we see a picture emerging of a woman who was in deep, deep need:  Her daughter was very ill.  But obstacles lay in her path to Jesus, obstacles that she met persevered in meeting, one-by-one:  The Lord’s silence when she first asked Him to heal her daughter, the disciples’ suggestion that the Lord dismiss her, and the Lord’s apparent rebuke when she knelt before Him.

            She didn’t give up, didn’t walk away.  She met each difficulty and kept on asking for help.

            In the end, the Lord commends her faith, saying, “Woman, great is your faith, let it be done for you as you wish.”

            Where the disciples failed to show faith (as in last week’s gospel lesson about Peter’s falling into the water), this foreign-born woman succeeded in showing her faith.  No doubt, to the original disciples, the woman’s background as a Canaanite must have been surprising, for she emerges as the one who does what is right.  After all, wasn’t God’s wisdom given the Jews, and not to Gentiles?  Yet the spread of the good news of Jesus Christ will soon go forth from the Jews into all the world, even spreading to Gentiles.  (See Matthew 28: 20)  The event we are considering this morning is a harbinger of the great things that are to come, as the Gentiles  overcome obstacles in coming to faith in the Lord.

            Whenever we ask the Lord for something, we can be assured that we will get an answer to our prayer.  The answer will generally fall into one of three categories:

            “Yes”:  Our request receives an affirmative answer from the Lord.

            “No”:  The Lord denies our request.  Oftentimes, this answer comes because the Lord sees a better response than the one we are able to imagine.  After all, the Lord, whose knowledge is beyond our comprehension, is able to see things that we cannot see.

            “Not now”:  Sometimes, the timing of an answer suits God’s purposes better than it suits ours.  But God’s time is always the best time to receive an answer. 

            Sometimes, in our faith walk, the Lord’s “No” answer is designed to test our faith.  When we receive a “No” answer, there are generally three ways in which we can respond:  1.  We can accept the answer, knowing that God’s will and God’s way is best;  2.  We can bring our request to the Lord again and again until an answer is received; or 3.  We can turn away from God.

            Accepting option 1 allow us to live most completely within God’s will.

            But exercising option 2 might prompt us to reflect on the wisdom of our request.  It might allow us to put into a better perspective just what it is we are asking the Lord to do, and how important (or unimportant) that request really is.  The Canaanite woman’s quick and witty response to the Lord’s comment shows that she was listening intently to what He said, for she seized on the idea that a relationship existed between the master and the puppies who shared the same household.

            In the end, this incident gives us room to be able to wrestle with our prayer requests, and to engage in give-and-take with the Lord as we present our needs to Him.  To be able to do so allows us to reflect on what we are asking for, and to keep our focus on the Lord as the one who can answer our prayers, as we listen intently for His answer.

AMEN.          


[1]   It is worth noting that the woman’s allusion to crumbs falling from their master’s table finds its way into our liturgy, for in the Prayer of Humble Access (page 337 in the Book of Common Prayer, 1979), we pray that “we are not worthy so much as to gather up the crumbs under thy table.”