Sunday, April 27, 2014

Easter 2, Year A



Acts 2: 14a, 22–32; Psalm 16; I Peter 1: 3–9; John 20: 19–31

A homily by Fr. Gene Tucker, given at Trinity Church, Mt. Vernon, Illinois on Sunday, April 27, 2014.

“FOUNDATIONS”
(Homily texts:  Acts 2: 14a, 22–32 & John 20: 19–31)

As we remember the Lord’s appearance to His disciple, Thomas, on the first Sunday following the first Easter, let’s talk a little this morning about foundations, for the Lord, in appearing to Thomas, is providing Thomas with the foundation that Thomas will need in order to believe in the Lord’s resurrection.  Let’s consider this event from the perspective of the foundation that the Lord provided for Thomas.

Foundations affect just about everything:  Foundations support the things we build.  Foundations support the ways in which we think.  Foundations support the ways we believe.  If we think about it, nearly everything in our lives has some sort of a foundation.

Consider, for example, our Trinity church building….when the contracts were signed and the builders began work, just about the first thing they did after having cleared the land was to begin digging for the foundation.  And, since this building was built in the first decade of the last century, it’s a pretty good guess that the work was done the hard way, with picks and shovels.  That’s a lot of work.  But that hard work had to precede what would come later, the building of the walls and the installation of the roof.  Without a good foundation, the building would not be stable, and its life span would be considerably shortened.

As the work on our church building continued, the workers would have had to erect scaffolding so that they could stand at the level that the walls had reached.  In essence, then, the scaffolding that became part of the work later on also served as part of the foundation that the builders needed in order to have a base from which to work.

In the area of thinking and behavior, our country’s Constitution serves as a foundation for the ways in which our country’s government will function.  Its enduring importance can be seen in the ways in which the courts are asked to determine if certain actions are in accordance with the Constitution.  Nearly every civic organization (and many churches) has a constitution, and some also have some sort of bylaws, which serve as the basis for the way in which the organization will function.

The Christian faith also has a foundation.  That foundation rests, primarily, on all the things having do to with Jesus Christ.  (Of course, the Old Testament parts of the Bible also form part of our foundation.)  The Christian faith is built on the witness of Jesus’ disciples, as we hear Peter relate in our reading from the Book of Acts this morning. These disciples are the ones who would become Apostles once He had sent them out to tell the Good News of God in Christ to the world after He had ascended into heaven.  So the New Testament is the written record of the eyewitnesses to all that Jesus did, but especially to His resurrection on Easter Sunday morning.  The New Testament is also the record of the beginnings of the Church, and of letters to those early Churches that often deal with specific problems and challenges.  So our foundation, the thing that supports how we think, what we believe, and how we will act, is the Bible.  For us as Anglican Christians, the Bible is the most important part of our foundation as Christian believers.

However, in addition to the Holy Scriptures, there are two other important parts of the foundation that allows us to believe in God, to come to serve the Lord Jesus Christ, and to know how to act:  That second source upon which we base all these things is our ability to think, or, as the 16th century Anglican priest, Richard Hooker,[1] would call it:  Right Reason.  Hooker made it clear that the Bible was the most important part of our foundation.  Right Reason would help support what we can understand about the Bible, but Right Reason cannot replace the Bible’s primary place as the foundation for faith.  Our ability to think allows us to understand at least some of what the Bible has to say.  Our ability to think allows us to make wiser choices than we might otherwise make, the Holy Spirit being our helper, counselor and guide.

But then there is a third part of our foundation for belief, and that is what Richard Hooker called Tradition.  Tradition consists, to a large extent, of what the Church’s founders believed, and by what has been affirmed by Christians everywhere and in every age.  That may be a somewhat simplistic explanation of what Tradition is, but I think it does justice to the concept.  It is worth adding here that tradition stretches back into time, transcending local customs in a local church.  Those customs and ways of doing things that we, at the local level, do may be part of our local tradition, but Tradition in the truest sense takes in all of Christian history.

We would do well to back up, at this point, and take a look at the disciple Thomas’ demand for a foundation for believing.  Remember that, in our gospel reading this morning,  John tells us that Thomas was not present when the Lord appeared to the other disciples.  So when Thomas was told that the Lord had come and had appeared to them, Thomas told the others that he would not believe unless he had physical proof of the Lord’s resurrection.  Thomas’ words were, “Unless I see in his hands the mark of the nails, and place my finger into the mark of the nails, and place my hand into his side, I will not believe.”

We might characterize Thomas’ demand as a demand to have some basis, some foundation, for faith in the Lord’s resurrection.  Thomas wants to be sure that the Lord had really come to life again.  He wanted to be so sure that he demanded physical proof of the Lord’s risen state….he not only wanted to see the mark[2] of the nails, but he also demanded to touch the mark of the nails and the spear wound in the Lord’s side.

Notice that the Lord offers Thomas just what Thomas demanded, as He said, “Put your finger here, and see my hands; and put out your hand, and place it into my side.  Do not doubt,[3] but believe.”

In response, Thomas exclaims, “My Lord and my God!”

Thomas now had the foundation he needed to go and tell the world that he had seen the risen Lord.  Tradition tells us that Thomas went as far as the subcontinent of India, telling that Good News.

These many years later, we Christians today have a foundation for our faith:  That foundation rests on the eyewitness accounts of the Apostles, who saw the risen Lord, and whose lives were completely changed as a result of their encounter with the risen Christ.  The four Gospel accounts of the New Testament serve as a written record of the things that Jesus did, and of the disciples’ experience of those things.  These things are the primary foundation for our Christian faith.

Our basis for believing also rests on our ability to see God in action in the world around us, and in the lives of those we know.  Our ability to think (Right Reason) allows us to understand what God is doing as people’s lives are changed, and as those we know come to new life in their faith walk with God.

Our basis for believing also rests on the Traditions of the body of Christ, known as the Church.  Like scaffolding that surrounds a building, this body of Tradition rests on the foundation of the Holy Scriptures.  It cannot stand on its own, but rests on the apostolic witness to Christ.  Tradition rises, like scaffolding around a building, as the years roll along.  Tradition must rest on the foundation of Holy Scripture.

So, though we have not seen the Lord as Thomas saw Him, physically present, may we be blessed in coming to belief in the risen Lord through the witness of John’s gospel account, as the Lord commends us this morning. 

May we come to exclaim, with Thomas, “My Lord and my God!”

AMEN.


[1]   Richard Hooker, 1554 – 1600, is the author of a large work called The Laws of Ecclesiastical Polity.  He is remembered for his explanation of the three sources of authority for Christian belief.  Sometimes, Hooker’s explanation is called the “three legged-stool”, as if to suggest that the Bible, Right Reason and Tradition are equal parts of our foundation for belief. That is a mischaracterization of what Hooker maintained, for he made it clear that the Bible was primary, and the Bible was followed by Right Reason and then by Tradition in their order of importance.
[2]   The Greek word which is usually translated as “mark” (topos – from which we get the English word “topography”) literally means “place”.
[3]   The word usually used in the translations of  this part of Jesus’ statement is “doubt”.  The better translation of the Greek word would be “faithless” (Greek:  apistos).  Of course it is the use of the word “doubt” which has given rise to the phrase “Doubting Thomas”.