Sunday, February 12, 2012

6 Epiphany, Year B

II Kings 5: 1 - 14; Psalm 30; I Corinthians 9: 24 - 27; Mark 1: 40 - 45

A homily by Fr. Gene Tucker, given at Trinity Church, Mt. Vernon, Illinois, on Sunday, February 12, 2012.

“THE ‘OUTSIDER’ IS RECEIVED INSIDE”(Homily texts:  II Kings 5: 1 – 14 & Mark 1: 40 - 45)

Who’s “in” and who’s “out”?

Such a question is often the concern of high school students, as they vie for acceptance.  In the process, groups get formed, and sometimes, they are groups made of people who think that they are “insiders”.  They may think of themselves as being superior in some way to “outsiders”.

We probably shouldn’t be too hard on high school students.  After all, I suspect that, if we are honest with ourselves and each other, we should probably admit that we might tend to engage in this sort of activity throughout much of our lives.

Belonging to a group is an important human need.  We are, after all, created to be in communion with one another, and with God.  That is our basic “design”, if you will, instilled by God into every human heart and mind at our creation.

As part of expressing and fulfilling this need, we identify a group that we would like to join, and then we do all that we can to remain a part of the group.  We might even adopt attitudes of superiority as we regard other groups or other individuals who aren’t in our group.  (One way this gets expressed in the Church is by claiming that “our” Church is better than others….what an arrogant attitude!)

Today’s gospel text is all about who’s “in” and who’s “out”.

Unfortunately, much of the context which existed in those ancient times for determining who falls into which category is lost to our 21st century ears and minds.  In order to recapture the sense of what society was like when Jesus’ earthly ministry took place, we need to back up a bit and examine the attitudes and behaviors of the Jews of His day.

The practices and attitudes which were found in Judaism 2,000 years ago had everything to do with being “clean” or “unclean”.

Cleanliness didn’t have to do so much with one’s physical cleanliness (I say this to a congregation whose expectations of cleanliness have much to do with the availability of clean water and plenty of soap!  After all, our society expects that people will bathe regularly), although the Law of Moses did prescribe bathing rituals at various times, such as before attending worship in the Tabernacle or the Temple.

No, cleanliness had much to do with a person’s physical infirmities, or the lack thereof.

Cleanliness in this sense made it possible for a person to attend public worship, or - conversely - a lack of cleanliness excluded a person from worship.

Put another way, if a person was clean, that person was “in”.  If the person was unclean, they were “out”.

This key aspect of life in that ancient time brings us directly to the matter of the healing of the leper in today’s gospel passage, which is before us.

Leprosy in the ancient world was one of the most feared physical conditions that afflicted humankind.  The Law of Moses’ directions for dealing with a person who was afflicted with it were clear.  And – to be fair – we need to remind ourselves that it wasn’t just the actual disease which is known as leprosy today (generally known as Hansen’s Disease), but a wide range of skin disorders and conditions that fell under the Law’s requirements.

We don’t know exactly what condition the man had who came up to Jesus, seeking Jesus’ healing ministry.
But we do know how the Law regarded these various skin conditions.  Among its provisions were these:

·          The Law’s provisions are laid out in the Book of Numbers, chapters 13 and 14.

·         Leprosy was regarded as a punishment for sin (see Numbers 12: 10 – 15).[1]

·         The person so affected was to wear torn clothing, have disheveled hair, to live outside the camp or town, and to cry out, “Unclean, unclean” if anyone approached (see Numbers 13: 45 – 46).

·         Physical contact with a person who was affected also rendered the other person as being unclean, as well.

·         A cure from leprosy was regarded as being as marvelous as being raised from the dead (see Numbers 12: 10 – 12, and II Kings 5:7[2]), for having leprosy was seen as a “living death”.

And so, as we look closely at the diseased man’s request of Jesus, we see that he says to Jesus, “If you will, you can make me clean” (italics mine, of course).

Notice that he doesn’t ask Jesus to heal him.  He asks to be made clean.

I don’t think I’m going too far out on a limb to suggest that the man’s request probably had something to do with being “in” again.

After all, the man couldn’t enter the Temple in Jerusalem to worship.  He couldn’t live in town.  He couldn’t associate with family members or former friends.  He couldn’t shop in the marketplace.  He was “out”, entirely “out”, of the community, outside of the ability to enter the holy place where God’s presence dwelt, and “out” everywhere else, too.

Such a world seems strange to us, doesn’t it?

But, if we reflect a little, I think we can see that we harbor some of the same attitudes as existed in the Judaism of Jesus’ day….Don’t we shy away from a poorly dressed person, or someone who could use a good shower, for example?

I will admit, I do that on occasion.

We might do the same thing with a person who has an obvious medical condition that is debilitating.

But what does Jesus do?  Instead of complying with the Law’s demands, Jesus crosses the boundaries, touching the man, and saying, “I will, be clean.”

Wait a minute….didn’t Jesus become “unclean” by touching the diseased man.

By the Law’s standards, yes, He did.

But He did it anyway.

Mark tells us that Jesus was “moved with compassion” for the man.

Compassion.  Love.  Concern for others.  All of these are hallmarks of Jesus’ ministry, His teachings, and His healings.

You see, if we consider the attitudes that the Mosaic law encouraged, we can see that its major concern was for the welfare of the group.  The individual was expected to honor the welfare of the group by separating him/herself from the group if they became unclean.  The other major concern of the Law was borne out of respect for God’s holiness.  That is to say, the cleanliness codes which we find in the Law existed to remind God’s people that He is holy, so holy, in fact, that no unclean thing or person could approach His presence.

So, in the Law, we have two major concerns:

            1.  God’s holiness, which demands cleanliness,

            2.  God’s people’s welfare, which demands that unclean persons separate themselves from the group.

But Jesus restores the concern that’s missing:  A concern for the individual’s welfare and wellbeing.

And He does so by bridging the gap, being willing to go “against the grain” of the normally-accepted Jewish behavior of His day, reaching out to touch the leprous man.  Instead of avoiding the man, He is willing to risk physical contact with the man in order to restore the man to the community, and to God.

So what does this incident teach us?

Perhaps these observations will serve to prompt our own reflection on the possible implications:

            1.  Jesus has a very holistic concern for God, for the welfare of God’s people, and for the welfare of the individual.  All three matter to Jesus.

            2.  Jesus conquers and bridges the gap between being “clean” and “unclean”.  In the process, Jesus conquers the “uncleanliness” and renders it “clean.” Just as Jesus accomplishes this feat with the diseased man in today’s text, so He will do with the matter of sin as He sacrifices Himself to make atonement for our sin.  In both instances, the gap which separates us from God is closed.

            3.  Jesus’ entire purpose is to bring those who are “outside” into fellowship with God and with God’s people. 

            4.  In bringing us “inside”, Jesus never leaves us where He finds us.  Movement toward cleanliness and wholeness takes place, as these conditions are removed by the power of Jesus Christ to heal, and by the indwelling presence of the Holy Spirit, who convicts us of sin and empowers us to make amendment of life, that we might become “clean”.  Jesus doesn’t call what is “unclean” “clean”….He removes the dirt (sin)!

As we enter this period just prior to the beginning of the holy season of Lent, perhaps a reflection on our own spiritual condition is in order.  May the Holy Spirit enable us to have the strength to examine our own lives, hearts and minds.  May the Holy Spirit enable us to see clearly those places which are “unclean”, and which are therefore unworthy to enter the presence of the holy God.

AMEN.




[1]   But so were any number of physical maladies and conditions.  For an example, see John, chapter nine, where a man’s blindness is attributed to either his sin, or the sin of his parents.
[2]   In our Old Testament reading for today, the account of the healing of Na’aman.