Sunday, November 17, 2024

Pentecost 26, Year B (2024)

Daniel 12: 1 - 3 / Psalm 16 / Hebrews 10: 11 – 14, 19 - 25 / Mark 13: 1 – 8

This is the homily given at Flohr’s Evangelical Lutheran Church (ELCA), in McKnightstown, Pennsylvania on Sunday, November 17, 2024 by The Rev. Gene R. Tucker.

 

“THE MYSTERY OF FAITH”

(Homily text: Mark 13: 1 – 8)

We must be getting close to the season of Advent, which features a double focus: Preparation for the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ as a babe in Bethlehem, and also preparation for the end of all things, when God’s purposes and plan have come to their full fruition.

This morning’s Gospel text can be discomforting, for our Lord points forward to a troubled time when the grandeur of the Temple in Jerusalem will cease to be. The Lord seems to be telling His disciples to look beyond the immediate size and scope of the Temple buildings, forward and beyond their seeming permanence, to a time when it will be necessary to be faithful, and to “endure to the end”, as we read in Mark 13:13 (not part of our appointed text for this morning).

To be faithful is to choose the very best for ourselves.

Hold that thought for a moment, as we look at the history of the building of the Temple, and to the events that caused its destruction.

King Herod the Great, who was a puppet king installed by the occupying Romans, ruled from 37 to 4 BC. The Jewish people had a love-hate relationship with him, for he was only part Jewish, and so – like the hated Samaritans – was not racially and ethnically “pure”. Moreover, Herod had the morals of an alley cat….he murdered some of his own immediate family (so as to maintain his hold on his kingship). But – on the other hand - the Jewish people in that day admired his building of the Temple in Jerusalem.

Construction on this new Temple began in about the year 20 BC. So, by the time of Herod’s death in 4 BC, the Temple was far from complete. In fact, its construction took a total of about 64 years, we hear from historians in that time. By the time of Jesus’ earthly ministry, much of the Temple’s construction was complete, enough, at least, for the disciples to marvel at the size and scope of it.

The Temple’s design was meant to impress: The Temple buildings itself were constructed on top of a large (33 acres) platform, whose walls were made up of large stones, some of which weighed an estimation 20 tons. That platform still exists today, for it was the Temple buildings themselves that were destroyed during the siege of Jerusalem in the year 70 AD. (The holiest site for Jews today is the Wailing Wall, which is at the base of the western wall of the Temple Mount.)

Now, let’s return to Jesus’ foretelling of the destruction of the Temple.

His prediction is of a type of literature and discourse called an “apocalypse”[1]. Oftentimes, when we hear this word, we don’t think of it as an “unveiling”, a pulling back of the curtain which lies over the future, as much as we think of wars and battles. But the basic meaning of “apocalypse” is that it is an unveiling, a peek into God’s plans, purposes and role in the future.

An apocalypse is just that: A glimpse into God’s plans and purposes.

Apocalyptic literature often arises during times when God’s people are in distress. So, another way to see this is to see that apocalyptic writing is meant to encourage God’s people, to enable them to lift their eyes beyond their immediate trouble and distress to see that God is still present, that God is still in control (although it might not look that way at the moment), and to see that God’s purposes will work out for God’s people. In the end, then, apocalyptic literature is meant to reassure God’s people that God will not abandon them, and that nothing can separate them from God and from God’s love, as St. Paul writes in Romans, chapter eight.

The time of Jesus’ earthly ministry was a deeply troubled time. The Jews chafed under the yoke of Roman rule. More than once, they pushed back against it, and then, they began a war to expel the Romans, a war that lasted from 66 – 70 AD, at which time Jerusalem was destroyed, and the Temple along with it.

After Jesus’ death and resurrection, as the young Church went out into the Gentile world, carrying the Good News of God in Christ, it, too, experienced difficult times and troubles. Consider, for example, that every one of the band of Jesus’ original disciples – except for one – suffered a martyr’s death.

Jesus exhorts His early followers, as He exhorts us today, to be faithful. To be faithful is to choose the best path, the best way to relate to God through Christ. To choose to make God the center of our being and our life, is to choose the very best, that very thing that will never go away.

In the age in which we live, many wonder and worry about what the future will hold. Notice, for example, how many pundits there are who offer their scenarios for future events. (Consider, also, the many down through time who’ve tried to predict when Jesus will return….they’ve all been wrong!)

Ours is a troubled age.

But, no matter what comes, we would do well to remember that nothing can separate us from God’s love, God’s strength, and God’s presence. St. Paul’s words, as we read them in chapter eight of his letter to the early Christians in Rome, ring true.

To choose God as first and as the foundation for our lives is to choose the very best. If we do that, then when problems and troubles come along (as they most certainly will from time-to-time), God will be able to strengthen us, God will be able to enlighten us so that we can meet those problems head on. We are assured that the Church will exist until the end of all things. The Church is that place where we meet God, and where God meets us. The Church is that place where we strengthen one another to be faithful until the end.

AMEN.

 



[1]   This section of Mark’s Gospel account is often known as the “Little Apocalypse”.  There are parallel passages in Matthew (24:1 – 51) and in Luke (21:5 – 38). 

Sunday, November 03, 2024

Pentecost 24, Year B (2024)

Deuteronomy 6: 1 – 9 / Psalm 119: 1 – 8 / Hebrews 9: 11 – 14 / Mark 12: 28 - 34

This is the homily given at Flohr’s Evangelical Lutheran Church (ELCA) in McKnightstown, Pennsylvania on Sunday, November 3, 2024.

 

“THE RULES AND THE RULES OF LOVE”

(Homily texts:  Deuteronomy 6: 1 – 9 & Mark 12: 28 - 34)

Back when I was a student at the Eastman School of Music in Rochester, NY, some of our singers would sing a song on their recitals entitled “Love in the Dictionary”. The text was a word-for-word definition of the word “love” as is found in dictionaries. The song itself was a bit humorous, as you might imagine.  The text went something like this:

Noun  a.  a powerful emotion felt for another person manifesting itself in deep affection, devotion or sexual desire; b. the object of this emotion; c. God’s regard for His creatures; d. a great liking, fondness; e. no score, nothing.

Verb  a.  to feel the passion of love for; b. to be fond of; c. to delight in, enjoy; d. to be in love.

Jesus makes clear that the requirement to love is as central to our life in God as are the rules that God has laid down for healthy and godly living.

With these two ideas in mind, the rules we are to live by, and the requirement to love, let’s turn our attention to two of our appointed text for this morning.

The Gospel text and our Old Testament reading from the Book of Deuteronomy are well matched, for Jesus quotes from Deuteronomy’s prescription for the most important aspects of a person’s walk with God: The requirement to put God first, and then to love God, others and oneself.

Mark tells us that a scribe came up to Jesus and, in order to test Him, asks, “Teacher, which commandment (in the Law) is the most important?”. Knowing the character of the Pharisees, the scribes and the priestly caste, one might wonder if this scribe had in mind an answer like “you shall not heal on the Sabbath”, or “you shall not pluck grain from the fields on the Sabbath”. Recall that Jesus got into trouble with these religious leaders for doing those two very things (among others).

Instead, Jesus responds by quoting the requirement found in the Law of Moses, the Torah, from Deuteronomy. He says, “Hear, O Israel, the Lord our God, the Lord is one”.[1] Then, he adds that there is a requirement to love God with one’s heart, mind soul and strength. Then, He says, one must love others and love oneself.[2]

It shouldn’t surprise us that Jesus and those who opposed Him were at odds with what was the most important aspect of a person’s walk with God. The scribes, Pharisees and the priests focused on the legal requirements of the Law of Moses. Stuff like doing no work on the Sabbath, for example. Jesus, in His response, makes it clear that God must form the very center of our lives, but that requirement alone isn’t all there is to the life of faith: Love is the other component that is essential.

It can be quite a challenge to balance God’s prescriptions for godly, holy living with the requirement to keep love as the central component of one’s life. On the surface, these two essential ingredients in a person’s life might seem to be polar opposites to one another.

Indeed, Christians down through time have wavered to one side or the other of these two requirements.

For example, the attitudes of the Pharisees are still evident among Christians who emphasize keeping the rules to the exclusion of ensuring that we act with love toward others and toward God. Judgmental attitudes often are markers of such an approach to faith.

But the other opposite is also present, for some Christians seem to adopt the idea that if we love a person, we’re going to approve of whatever they do. In such cases, love is equated with permissiveness. (Here it would be a good idea to remind ourselves of the meaning of the word “love”.)

If we consider God’s nature, two major realities become apparent: God is a holy God, a righteous God, a God who cannot abide evil. But the other side of God’s nature is that God is a merciful God, a God who loves deeply, intensely and permanently

These two natures inform one another.

If God were only that holy, righteous God, then we could expect that God would reject each and every one of us because of our nature, which falls short of God’s standard of holiness.

If God were only that loving God, then we might think that God is that God who allows and approves of everything we might consider doing or thinking.

In the Sacrament of Holy Baptism, we find both of God’s natures present, as we enter the waters of Baptism, there to die to our old natures and to rise to a new, risen life with Christ.[3] God is the originator of this gift of Baptism. It is God who allows us to descend into the waters, but it is God, through Christ, who offers us a new beginning, a new and forgiven life, a life that has God’s power to overcome shortcomings, failures and sin. God’s love for each one of us forms the basis for knowing what a holy life looks like.

One final thought is in order here: Lutheran teaching and theology emphasize God’s natures as one of holiness and one of love. This understanding is one of the Lutheran gifts to the wider world and to other Christians.

Thanks be to God, who loves us, and who empowers us to live lives that honor God’s love and God’s holiness.

AMEN.



[1]   This is known as the Sh’ma, and it is sung or said in synagogues to this day.

[2]   Jesus quotes from Leviticus 19:18 here.

[3]   This is St. Paul’s description of Baptism, as we find it in Romans 6: 3 – 9.